En DashHotdogBenchmark
Source on GitHub: fork it, clone it

The Wrap Question, week by week

One piece of bread, rolled. The structural cousin of the hot dog.

Week 42, 2026, up close

Did each model agree with itself?

Every sample's answer, in the order it was taken, under each framing. A row of identical chips is a model that has made up its mind. Y is yes, N is no, ~ is a hedge.

Sample-by-sample verdicts per model and framing, Week 42, 2026
ModelControlAssertedDeniedSelf-agreement
Claude Opus 5100%
Claude Sonnet 589%
Claude Haiku 4.5100%
GPT-5.6 Sol100%
GPT-5.5100%
GPT-5.4 mini100%
Grok 4.6100%
Grok 4.3100%
Grok 4.20 (non-reasoning)89%
Mistral Medium 3.5no datano datano data—
Mistral Small 4no datano datano data—
DeepSeek V4 Pro89%

How much did latency swing?

The fastest and slowest call behind each median, asked plainly. A long bar is a model whose speed you cannot count on.

Fastest, median and slowest call per model, Week 42, 2026
ModelRangeFastestMedianSlowest
Claude Opus 52.3 s3.4 s9 s
Claude Sonnet 51 s1.1 s1.2 s
Claude Haiku 4.5464 ms519 ms520 ms
GPT-5.6 Sol914 ms926 ms1.3 s
GPT-5.51.1 s1.2 s1.3 s
GPT-5.4 mini596 ms697 ms1.2 s
Grok 4.612.1 s14.5 s15.3 s
Grok 4.310.2 s13.4 s15.3 s
Grok 4.20 (non-reasoning)441 ms570 ms9 s
DeepSeek V4 Pro1.6 s1.8 s2 s

Asked again the same week

Week 42, 2026 was run once. When a week is re-run, the earlier runs are kept and the answers that changed between them show up here.

Position changes

Models whose majority verdict changed between consecutive editions
ModelPrevious positionRevised positionBetween editions
Claude Opus 5AffirmativeNegativeWeek 40, 2026 → Week 42, 2026
Grok 4.20 (non-reasoning)AffirmativeNegativeWeek 40, 2026 → Week 42, 2026
Claude Opus 5NegativeAffirmativeWeek 36, 2026 → Week 37, 2026