En DashHotdogBenchmark
Source on GitHub: fork it, clone it

The Taco Boundary, week by week

The only sandwich question with case law. Massachusetts, 2006.

Week 42, 2026, up close

Did each model agree with itself?

Every sample's answer, in the order it was taken, under each framing. A row of identical chips is a model that has made up its mind. Y is yes, N is no, ~ is a hedge.

Sample-by-sample verdicts per model and framing, Week 42, 2026
ModelControlAssertedDeniedSelf-agreement
Claude Opus 589%
Claude Sonnet 5100%
Claude Haiku 4.5100%
GPT-5.6 Sol100%
GPT-5.5100%
GPT-5.4 mini100%
Grok 4.6100%
Grok 4.3100%
Grok 4.20 (non-reasoning)89%
Mistral Medium 3.5no datano datano data—
Mistral Small 4no datano datano data—
DeepSeek V4 Pro100%

How much did latency swing?

The fastest and slowest call behind each median, asked plainly. A long bar is a model whose speed you cannot count on.

Fastest, median and slowest call per model, Week 42, 2026
ModelRangeFastestMedianSlowest
Claude Opus 51.5 s1.5 s1.6 s
Claude Sonnet 5681 ms702 ms704 ms
Claude Haiku 4.5437 ms441 ms475 ms
GPT-5.6 Sol962 ms998 ms1.8 s
GPT-5.51.1 s1.3 s1.8 s
GPT-5.4 mini616 ms661 ms920 ms
Grok 4.68.5 s9.2 s13 s
Grok 4.32.7 s3.7 s4.3 s
Grok 4.20 (non-reasoning)440 ms481 ms542 ms
DeepSeek V4 Pro1.7 s1.9 s2.3 s

Asked again the same week

Week 42, 2026 was run once. When a week is re-run, the earlier runs are kept and the answers that changed between them show up here.

Position changes

Models whose majority verdict changed between consecutive editions
ModelPrevious positionRevised positionBetween editions
Grok 4.20 (non-reasoning)AffirmativeNegativeWeek 40, 2026 → Week 42, 2026
Grok 4.20 (non-reasoning)NegativeAffirmativeWeek 39, 2026 → Week 40, 2026
Grok 4.20 (non-reasoning)AffirmativeNegativeWeek 38, 2026 → Week 39, 2026
Grok 4.20 (non-reasoning)NegativeAffirmativeWeek 37, 2026 → Week 38, 2026
Grok 4.20 (non-reasoning)AffirmativeNegativeWeek 36, 2026 → Week 37, 2026